The case for an epiphyte area index.

Wischmeyer C, Gotsch SG, Porada P, Van Stan JT 2nd

DOI: 10.1111/nph.71435
Published: 2026 Jul 23
Container: The New phytologist
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/nph.71435,
  title = {The case for an epiphyte area index.},
  author = {Wischmeyer C and Gotsch SG and Porada P and Van Stan JT 2nd},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {The New phytologist},
  doi = {10.1111/nph.71435},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71435}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The case for an epiphyte area index.
AU  - Wischmeyer C
AU  - Gotsch SG
AU  - Porada P
AU  - Van Stan JT 2nd
PY  - 2026
JO  - The New phytologist
DO  - 10.1111/nph.71435
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71435
ER  -

APA

C, W., SG, G., P, P., & 2nd, V. S. J. (2026). The case for an epiphyte area index.. The New phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71435

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T21:17:59.601Z