Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs. Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Mechanics During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment—A Randomised Controlled Trial

Bushra Anis, Sadia Rizwan, Sadaf Zehra, Anam Sattar, Muhammad Arsalan, Laraib Nasir

Open source

DOI
10.1111/ocr.70198
Published
2026-11-03
Container
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/ocr.70198,
  title = {Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs. Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Mechanics During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment—A Randomised Controlled Trial},
  author = {Bushra Anis and Sadia Rizwan and Sadaf Zehra and Anam Sattar and Muhammad Arsalan and Laraib Nasir},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Orthodontics \& Craniofacial Research},
  doi = {10.1111/ocr.70198},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70198}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs. Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Mechanics During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment—A Randomised Controlled Trial
AU  - Bushra Anis
AU  - Sadia Rizwan
AU  - Sadaf Zehra
AU  - Anam Sattar
AU  - Muhammad Arsalan
AU  - Laraib Nasir
PY  - 2026
JO  - Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
DO  - 10.1111/ocr.70198
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70198
ER  - 

APA

Anis, B., Rizwan, S., Zehra, S., Sattar, A., Arsalan, M., & Nasir, L. (2026). Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs. Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Mechanics During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment—A Randomised Controlled Trial. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70198

Source records