Retraction Statement: ‘Safety and Feasibility of Leadless Pacemaker Compared with Traditional Transvenous Single‐Lead Pacemaker: An Animal Study’ by Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, and Zheng X.

Author unknown

Open source

DOI
10.1111/pace.12602
Published
2015-04
Container
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 23/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/pace.12602,
  title = {Retraction Statement: ‘Safety and Feasibility of Leadless Pacemaker Compared with Traditional Transvenous Single‐Lead Pacemaker: An Animal Study’ by Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, and Zheng X.},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology},
  doi = {10.1111/pace.12602},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12602}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Retraction Statement: ‘Safety and Feasibility of Leadless Pacemaker Compared with Traditional Transvenous Single‐Lead Pacemaker: An Animal Study’ by Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, and Zheng X.
PY  - 2015
JO  - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
DO  - 10.1111/pace.12602
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12602
ER  - 

APA

Retraction Statement: ‘Safety and Feasibility of Leadless Pacemaker Compared with Traditional Transvenous Single‐Lead Pacemaker: An Animal Study’ by Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, and Zheng X.. (2015). Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12602

Source records