Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
- DOI
- 10.1111/pace.70350
- Published
- 2026 Jul 3
- Container
- Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/pace.70350,
title = {Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.},
author = {Bola H and Arif A and J Hon J and Giritharan G and Khandelwal P and Avakian R and Rai A and Patel KHK and Ng FS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE},
doi = {10.1111/pace.70350},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70350}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. AU - Bola H AU - Arif A AU - J Hon J AU - Giritharan G AU - Khandelwal P AU - Avakian R AU - Rai A AU - Patel KHK AU - Ng FS PY - 2026 JO - Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE DO - 10.1111/pace.70350 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70350 ER -
APA
H, B., A, A., J, J. H., G, G., P, K., R, A., A, R., KHK, P., & FS, N. (2026). Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70350
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:46:40.969Z