Case study: The downside of using a worst-case approach in occupational safety policy as an interpretation of the precautionary principle: Putting the uncertain UXO occupational safety risk into probabilistic perspective.

Helsloot M, Snip W, Helsloot I

Open source

DOI
10.1111/risa.17653
Published
2025 May
Container
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/risa.17653,
  title = {Case study: The downside of using a worst-case approach in occupational safety policy as an interpretation of the precautionary principle: Putting the uncertain UXO occupational safety risk into probabilistic perspective.},
  author = {Helsloot M and Snip W and Helsloot I},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis},
  doi = {10.1111/risa.17653},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17653}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Case study: The downside of using a worst-case approach in occupational safety policy as an interpretation of the precautionary principle: Putting the uncertain UXO occupational safety risk into probabilistic perspective.
AU  - Helsloot M
AU  - Snip W
AU  - Helsloot I
PY  - 2025
JO  - Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
DO  - 10.1111/risa.17653
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17653
ER  - 

APA

M, H., W, S., & I, H. (2025). Case study: The downside of using a worst-case approach in occupational safety policy as an interpretation of the precautionary principle: Putting the uncertain UXO occupational safety risk into probabilistic perspective.. Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17653

Source records