Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol.
- DOI
- 10.11124/jbies-22-00055
- Published
- 2023 Jan 1
- Container
- JBI evidence synthesis
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.11124/jbies-22-00055,
title = {Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol.},
author = {Bhuiya AR and Makarski J and Hayden L and Perrier L and Munce S and Lewis I and Graham ID and Holroyd-Leduc J and Straus SE and Stelfox HT and Strifler L and Lokker C and Li LC and Leung FH and Dobbins M and Ritchie LMP and Squires J and Rac V and Fahim C and Kastner M},
year = {2023},
journal = {JBI evidence synthesis},
doi = {10.11124/jbies-22-00055},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00055}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol. AU - Bhuiya AR AU - Makarski J AU - Hayden L AU - Perrier L AU - Munce S AU - Lewis I AU - Graham ID AU - Holroyd-Leduc J AU - Straus SE AU - Stelfox HT AU - Strifler L AU - Lokker C AU - Li LC AU - Leung FH AU - Dobbins M AU - Ritchie LMP AU - Squires J AU - Rac V AU - Fahim C AU - Kastner M PY - 2023 JO - JBI evidence synthesis DO - 10.11124/jbies-22-00055 UR - https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00055 ER -
APA
AR, B., J, M., L, H., L, P., S, M., I, L., ID, G., J, H., SE, S., HT, S., L, S., C, L., LC, L., FH, L., M, D., LMP, R., J, S., V, R., C, F., & M, K. (2023). Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol.. JBI evidence synthesis. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00055
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:55:33.278Z