Myths and Methodologies: Standardisation in human physiology research-should we control the controllables?
- DOI
- 10.1113/ep091557
- Published
- 2024 Jul
- Container
- Experimental physiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1113/ep091557,
title = {Myths and Methodologies: Standardisation in human physiology research-should we control the controllables?},
author = {Merrell LH and Perkin OJ and Bradshaw L and Collier-Bain HD and Collins AJ and Davies S and Eddy R and Hickman JA and Nicholas AP and Rees D and Spellanzon B and James LJ and McKay AKA and Smith HA and Turner JE and Koumanov F and Maher J and Thompson D and Gonzalez JT and Betts JA},
year = {2024},
journal = {Experimental physiology},
doi = {10.1113/ep091557},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1113/ep091557}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Myths and Methodologies: Standardisation in human physiology research-should we control the controllables? AU - Merrell LH AU - Perkin OJ AU - Bradshaw L AU - Collier-Bain HD AU - Collins AJ AU - Davies S AU - Eddy R AU - Hickman JA AU - Nicholas AP AU - Rees D AU - Spellanzon B AU - James LJ AU - McKay AKA AU - Smith HA AU - Turner JE AU - Koumanov F AU - Maher J AU - Thompson D AU - Gonzalez JT AU - Betts JA PY - 2024 JO - Experimental physiology DO - 10.1113/ep091557 UR - https://doi.org/10.1113/ep091557 ER -
APA
LH, M., OJ, P., L, B., HD, C., AJ, C., S, D., R, E., JA, H., AP, N., D, R., B, S., LJ, J., AKA, M., HA, S., JE, T., F, K., J, M., D, T., JT, G., & JA, B. (2024). Myths and Methodologies: Standardisation in human physiology research-should we control the controllables?. Experimental physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/ep091557
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:23:55.214Z