Comparing evaluation of quantitative imaging methods using reference standards versus regression‑without‑truth‑based technique
- DOI
- 10.1117/12.3087777
- Published
- 2026-04-02
- Container
- Medical Imaging 2026: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1117/12.3087777,
title = {Comparing evaluation of quantitative imaging methods using reference standards versus regression‑without‑truth‑based technique},
author = {Yan Liu and Abhinav K. Jha},
year = {2026},
journal = {Medical Imaging 2026: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment},
doi = {10.1117/12.3087777},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3087777}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing evaluation of quantitative imaging methods using reference standards versus regression‑without‑truth‑based technique AU - Yan Liu AU - Abhinav K. Jha PY - 2026 JO - Medical Imaging 2026: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment DO - 10.1117/12.3087777 UR - https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3087777 ER -
APA
Liu, Y., & Jha, A. K. (2026). Comparing evaluation of quantitative imaging methods using reference standards versus regression‑without‑truth‑based technique. Medical Imaging 2026: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3087777
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:16:56.750Z