NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores
- DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868
- Published
- 2020-06-05
- Container
- Science Advances
- Publisher
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868,
title = {NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores},
author = {Elena A. Erosheva and Sheridan Grant and Mei-Ching Chen and Mark D. Lindner and Richard K. Nakamura and Carole J. Lee},
year = {2020},
journal = {Science Advances},
doi = {10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores AU - Elena A. Erosheva AU - Sheridan Grant AU - Mei-Ching Chen AU - Mark D. Lindner AU - Richard K. Nakamura AU - Carole J. Lee PY - 2020 JO - Science Advances DO - 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868 UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868 ER -
APA
Erosheva, E. A., Grant, S., Chen, M., Lindner, M. D., Nakamura, R. K., & Lee, C. J. (2020). NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:14:09.462Z