NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores.

Erosheva EA, Grant S, Chen MC, Lindner MD, Nakamura RK, Lee CJ

Open source

DOI
10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868
Published
2020 Jun
Container
Science advances
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868,
  title = {NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores.},
  author = {Erosheva EA and Grant S and Chen MC and Lindner MD and Nakamura RK and Lee CJ},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Science advances},
  doi = {10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores.
AU  - Erosheva EA
AU  - Grant S
AU  - Chen MC
AU  - Lindner MD
AU  - Nakamura RK
AU  - Lee CJ
PY  - 2020
JO  - Science advances
DO  - 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868
ER  - 

APA

EA, E., S, G., MC, C., MD, L., RK, N., & CJ, L. (2020). NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores.. Science advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868

Source records