The science and practice of proportionality in AI risk evaluations.
- DOI
- 10.1126/science.aea3835
- Published
- 2026 Feb 19
- Container
- Science (New York, N.Y.)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1126/science.aea3835,
title = {The science and practice of proportionality in AI risk evaluations.},
author = {Mougan C and Morlock L and Aguirre J and Black JRM and Brauner J and Campos S and Dev S and Llorca DF and Franzin A and Fritz M and Gómez E and Grosse-Holz F and Hamilton E and Hasin M and Hernandez-Orallo J and Lahav D and Massarelli L and Mavroudis V and Murray M and Paskov P and Raldua J and Schellaert W},
year = {2026},
journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)},
doi = {10.1126/science.aea3835},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea3835}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The science and practice of proportionality in AI risk evaluations. AU - Mougan C AU - Morlock L AU - Aguirre J AU - Black JRM AU - Brauner J AU - Campos S AU - Dev S AU - Llorca DF AU - Franzin A AU - Fritz M AU - Gómez E AU - Grosse-Holz F AU - Hamilton E AU - Hasin M AU - Hernandez-Orallo J AU - Lahav D AU - Massarelli L AU - Mavroudis V AU - Murray M AU - Paskov P AU - Raldua J AU - Schellaert W PY - 2026 JO - Science (New York, N.Y.) DO - 10.1126/science.aea3835 UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea3835 ER -
APA
C, M., L, M., J, A., JRM, B., J, B., S, C., S, D., DF, L., A, F., M, F., E, G., F, G., E, H., M, H., J, H., D, L., L, M., V, M., M, M., P, P., J, R., & W, S. (2026). The science and practice of proportionality in AI risk evaluations.. Science (New York, N.Y.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea3835
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:22.385Z