Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.
- DOI
- 10.1128/jcm.02078-05
- Published
- 2006 Oct
- Container
- Journal of clinical microbiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1128/jcm.02078-05,
title = {Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.},
author = {Hesselink AT and Bulkmans NW and Berkhof J and Lorincz AT and Meijer CJ and Snijders PJ},
year = {2006},
journal = {Journal of clinical microbiology},
doi = {10.1128/jcm.02078-05},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02078-05}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program. AU - Hesselink AT AU - Bulkmans NW AU - Berkhof J AU - Lorincz AT AU - Meijer CJ AU - Snijders PJ PY - 2006 JO - Journal of clinical microbiology DO - 10.1128/jcm.02078-05 UR - https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02078-05 ER -
APA
AT, H., NW, B., J, B., AT, L., CJ, M., & PJ, S. (2006). Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.. Journal of clinical microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02078-05
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:11:23.998Z