Rarefaction is better than robust Aitchison PCA and other compositional data analysis methods at controlling for uneven sequencing effort

Patrick D. Schloss

Open source

DOI
10.1128/msystems.00930-26
Published
2026-10-20
Container
mSystems
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1128/msystems.00930-26,
  title = {Rarefaction is better than robust Aitchison PCA and other compositional data analysis methods at controlling for uneven sequencing effort},
  author = {Patrick D. Schloss},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {mSystems},
  doi = {10.1128/msystems.00930-26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00930-26}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rarefaction is better than robust Aitchison PCA and other compositional data analysis methods at controlling for uneven sequencing effort
AU  - Patrick D. Schloss
PY  - 2026
JO  - mSystems
DO  - 10.1128/msystems.00930-26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00930-26
ER  - 

APA

Schloss, P. D. (2026). Rarefaction is better than robust Aitchison PCA and other compositional data analysis methods at controlling for uneven sequencing effort. mSystems. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00930-26

Source records