Augmented medial rectus recession versus botulinum toxin therapy for acute acquired comitant esotropia: analysis of outcomes and recurrence predictors
- DOI
- 10.1136/bjo-2025-328201
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- Container
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bjo-2025-328201,
title = {Augmented medial rectus recession versus botulinum toxin therapy for acute acquired comitant esotropia: analysis of outcomes and recurrence predictors},
author = {Yueping Li and Tengyue Zhang and Juan Ding and Rui Hao and Liping Chen and Fang Xie and Ping Zhu and Wei Zhang},
year = {2025},
journal = {British Journal of Ophthalmology},
doi = {10.1136/bjo-2025-328201},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328201}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Augmented medial rectus recession versus botulinum toxin therapy for acute acquired comitant esotropia: analysis of outcomes and recurrence predictors AU - Yueping Li AU - Tengyue Zhang AU - Juan Ding AU - Rui Hao AU - Liping Chen AU - Fang Xie AU - Ping Zhu AU - Wei Zhang PY - 2025 JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology DO - 10.1136/bjo-2025-328201 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328201 ER -
APA
Li, Y., Zhang, T., Ding, J., Hao, R., Chen, L., Xie, F., Zhu, P., & Zhang, W. (2025). Augmented medial rectus recession versus botulinum toxin therapy for acute acquired comitant esotropia: analysis of outcomes and recurrence predictors. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328201
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T01:20:42.532Z