A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bjo.2008.149658
- Published
- 2009 Jul
- Container
- The British journal of ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bjo.2008.149658,
title = {A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia.},
author = {Polling JR and Eijkemans MJ and Esser J and Gilles U and Kolling GH and Schulz E and Lorenz B and Roggenkämper P and Herzau V and Zubcov A and ten Tusscher MP and Wittebol-Post D and Gusek-Schneider GC and Cruysberg JR and Simonsz HJ},
year = {2009},
journal = {The British journal of ophthalmology},
doi = {10.1136/bjo.2008.149658},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.149658}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia. AU - Polling JR AU - Eijkemans MJ AU - Esser J AU - Gilles U AU - Kolling GH AU - Schulz E AU - Lorenz B AU - Roggenkämper P AU - Herzau V AU - Zubcov A AU - ten Tusscher MP AU - Wittebol-Post D AU - Gusek-Schneider GC AU - Cruysberg JR AU - Simonsz HJ PY - 2009 JO - The British journal of ophthalmology DO - 10.1136/bjo.2008.149658 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.149658 ER -
APA
JR, P., MJ, E., J, E., U, G., GH, K., E, S., B, L., P, R., V, H., A, Z., MP, T. T., D, W., GC, G., JR, C., & HJ, S. (2009). A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia.. The British journal of ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.149658
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:56:00.484Z