American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom.

Nathan DM

Open source

DOI
10.1136/bmj-2026-555118
Published
2026 Jun 12
Container
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/bmj-2026-555118,
  title = {American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom.},
  author = {Nathan DM},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMJ (Clinical research ed.)},
  doi = {10.1136/bmj-2026-555118},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-555118}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom.
AU  - Nathan DM
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
DO  - 10.1136/bmj-2026-555118
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-555118
ER  - 

APA

DM, N. (2026). American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-555118

Source records