When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963
- Published
- 2018-10-11
- Container
- BMJ Evid Based Med
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963,
title = {When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews.},
author = {Jefferson T and Doshi P and Boutron I and Golder S and Heneghan C and Hodkinson A and Jones M and Lefebvre C and Stewart LA.},
year = {2018},
journal = {BMJ Evid Based Med},
doi = {10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews. AU - Jefferson T AU - Doshi P AU - Boutron I AU - Golder S AU - Heneghan C AU - Hodkinson A AU - Jones M AU - Lefebvre C AU - Stewart LA. PY - 2018 JO - BMJ Evid Based Med DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963 ER -
APA
T, J., P, D., I, B., S, G., C, H., A, H., M, J., C, L., & LA., S. (2018). When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews.. BMJ Evid Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110963
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:13:41.185Z