How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086
- Published
- 2026 Jul 21
- Container
- BMJ health & care informatics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086,
title = {How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters.},
author = {Ong AY and Kiire CA and Wagner SK and Nguyen Q and Thomas PBM and Keane PA},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMJ health \& care informatics},
doi = {10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters. AU - Ong AY AU - Kiire CA AU - Wagner SK AU - Nguyen Q AU - Thomas PBM AU - Keane PA PY - 2026 JO - BMJ health & care informatics DO - 10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086 ER -
APA
AY, O., CA, K., SK, W., Q, N., PBM, T., & PA, K. (2026). How well do we write for patients? Longitudinal analysis of the readability and complexity of 4.6 million ophthalmic clinical letters.. BMJ health & care informatics. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2026-102086
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:38:26.514Z