Effectiveness of different de-implementation strategies in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- BMJ medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343,
title = {Effectiveness of different de-implementation strategies in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Raudasoja A and Parpia S and Mustonen JMJ and Vernooij R and Falkenbach P and Aoki Y and Barchuk A and Blanker MH and Cartwright R and Crowder K and Garcia-Perdomo HA and Gutschon R and Halme ALE and Kilpeläinen TP and Kuitunen I and Lamberg T and Lang E and Matos J and Nevalainen OPO and Nordlund NK and Pourjamal N and Raittio E and Richard PO and Violette PD and Komulainen JT and Sipilä R and Tikkinen KAO},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMJ medicine},
doi = {10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Effectiveness of different de-implementation strategies in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Raudasoja A AU - Parpia S AU - Mustonen JMJ AU - Vernooij R AU - Falkenbach P AU - Aoki Y AU - Barchuk A AU - Blanker MH AU - Cartwright R AU - Crowder K AU - Garcia-Perdomo HA AU - Gutschon R AU - Halme ALE AU - Kilpeläinen TP AU - Kuitunen I AU - Lamberg T AU - Lang E AU - Matos J AU - Nevalainen OPO AU - Nordlund NK AU - Pourjamal N AU - Raittio E AU - Richard PO AU - Violette PD AU - Komulainen JT AU - Sipilä R AU - Tikkinen KAO PY - 2025 JO - BMJ medicine DO - 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343 ER -
APA
A, R., S, P., JMJ, M., R, V., P, F., Y, A., A, B., MH, B., R, C., K, C., HA, G., R, G., ALE, H., TP, K., I, K., T, L., E, L., J, M., OPO, N., NK, N., N, P., E, R., PO, R., PD, V., JT, K., R, S., & KAO, T. (2025). Effectiveness of different de-implementation strategies in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:50:20.036Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:50:20.053Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:50:20.044Z