Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867
- Published
- 2015-01
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867,
title = {Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial},
author = {R Byaruhanga and D G Bassani and A Jagau and P Muwanguzi and A L Montgomery and J E Lawn},
year = {2015},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial AU - R Byaruhanga AU - D G Bassani AU - A Jagau AU - P Muwanguzi AU - A L Montgomery AU - J E Lawn PY - 2015 JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867 ER -
APA
Byaruhanga, R., Bassani, D. G., Jagau, A., Muwanguzi, P., Montgomery, A. L., & Lawn, J. E. (2015). Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:59:52.933Z