Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546
- Published
- 2017-10
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546,
title = {Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design},
author = {Jesus Maria Aranaz Andrés and Ramon Limón Ramírez and Carlos Aibar Remón and Maria Teresa Gea-Velázquez de Castro and Francisco Bolúmar and Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado and Nieves López Fresneña and Cristina Díaz-Agero Pérez and Enrique Terol García and Philippe Michel and Paulo Sousa and Itziar Larizgoitia Jauregui},
year = {2017},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design AU - Jesus Maria Aranaz Andrés AU - Ramon Limón Ramírez AU - Carlos Aibar Remón AU - Maria Teresa Gea-Velázquez de Castro AU - Francisco Bolúmar AU - Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado AU - Nieves López Fresneña AU - Cristina Díaz-Agero Pérez AU - Enrique Terol García AU - Philippe Michel AU - Paulo Sousa AU - Itziar Larizgoitia Jauregui PY - 2017 JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546 ER -
APA
Andrés, J. M. A., Ramírez, R. L., Remón, C. A., Castro, M. T. G. D., Bolúmar, F., Hernández-Aguado, I., Fresneña, N. L., Pérez, C. D., García, E. T., Michel, P., Sousa, P., & Jauregui, I. L. (2017). Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T01:57:00.260Z