‘Not clinically effective but cost-effective’ - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with ‘doubly null’ results: a cross-sectional study

James Raftery, HC Williams, Aileen Clarke, Jim Thornton, John Norrie, Helen Snooks, Ken Stein

Open source

DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596
Published
2020-01
Container
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596,
  title = {‘Not clinically effective but cost-effective’ - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with ‘doubly null’ results: a cross-sectional study},
  author = {James Raftery and HC Williams and Aileen Clarke and Jim Thornton and John Norrie and Helen Snooks and Ken Stein},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {BMJ Open},
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ‘Not clinically effective but cost-effective’ - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with ‘doubly null’ results: a cross-sectional study
AU  - James Raftery
AU  - HC Williams
AU  - Aileen Clarke
AU  - Jim Thornton
AU  - John Norrie
AU  - Helen Snooks
AU  - Ken Stein
PY  - 2020
JO  - BMJ Open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596
ER  - 

APA

Raftery, J., Williams, H., Clarke, A., Thornton, J., Norrie, J., Snooks, H., & Stein, K. (2020). ‘Not clinically effective but cost-effective’ - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with ‘doubly null’ results: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596

Source records