Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140
- Published
- 2019-10
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140,
title = {Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study},
author = {Laura Jones and Emma Danks and Joanne Clarke and Lailah Alidu and Benjamin Costello and Kate Jolly and Alison Byrne and Meg Fassam-Wright and Pallavi Latthe and Julie Taylor},
year = {2019},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study AU - Laura Jones AU - Emma Danks AU - Joanne Clarke AU - Lailah Alidu AU - Benjamin Costello AU - Kate Jolly AU - Alison Byrne AU - Meg Fassam-Wright AU - Pallavi Latthe AU - Julie Taylor PY - 2019 JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140 ER -
APA
Jones, L., Danks, E., Clarke, J., Alidu, L., Costello, B., Jolly, K., Byrne, A., Fassam-Wright, M., Latthe, P., & Taylor, J. (2019). Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:52:40.288Z