Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database.

Costea A, Goldstein L, Maccioni S, Kalsekar I, Khanna R

Open source

DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499
Published
2020 Aug 5
Container
BMJ open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499,
  title = {Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database.},
  author = {Costea A and Goldstein L and Maccioni S and Kalsekar I and Khanna R},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {BMJ open},
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database.
AU  - Costea A
AU  - Goldstein L
AU  - Maccioni S
AU  - Kalsekar I
AU  - Khanna R
PY  - 2020
JO  - BMJ open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499
ER  - 

APA

A, C., L, G., S, M., I, K., & R, K. (2020). Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035499

Source records