Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846
- Published
- 2020-07
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846,
title = {Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review},
author = {Vanessa Abrahamson and Wenjing Zhang and Patricia Wilson and William Farr and Ian Male},
year = {2020},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review AU - Vanessa Abrahamson AU - Wenjing Zhang AU - Patricia Wilson AU - William Farr AU - Ian Male PY - 2020 JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846 ER -
APA
Abrahamson, V., Zhang, W., Wilson, P., Farr, W., & Male, I. (2020). Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:27:03.524Z