Study protocol of a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis using two different approaches: Healthcare related needs and desires of older people with post-stroke aphasia.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348
- Published
- 2021 Apr 8
- Container
- BMJ open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348,
title = {Study protocol of a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis using two different approaches: Healthcare related needs and desires of older people with post-stroke aphasia.},
author = {Pohontsch NJ and Meyer T and Eisenmann Y and Metzendorf MI and Leve V and Lentsch V and working group ‘Qualitative Methods in Health Services Research’ of the German Network of Health Services Research},
year = {2021},
journal = {BMJ open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Study protocol of a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis using two different approaches: Healthcare related needs and desires of older people with post-stroke aphasia. AU - Pohontsch NJ AU - Meyer T AU - Eisenmann Y AU - Metzendorf MI AU - Leve V AU - Lentsch V AU - working group ‘Qualitative Methods in Health Services Research’ of the German Network of Health Services Research PY - 2021 JO - BMJ open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348 ER -
APA
NJ, P., T, M., Y, E., MI, M., V, L., V, L., & Research, W. G. ‘. M. I. H. S. R. O. T. G. N. O. H. S. (2021). Study protocol of a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis using two different approaches: Healthcare related needs and desires of older people with post-stroke aphasia.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039348
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:49:11.340Z