How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709
- Published
- 2020 Nov 26
- Container
- BMJ open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709,
title = {How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK.},
author = {Tallett A and Poots AJ and Graham C and Peters M and Corbett R and Sizmur S and Forder J},
year = {2020},
journal = {BMJ open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK. AU - Tallett A AU - Poots AJ AU - Graham C AU - Peters M AU - Corbett R AU - Sizmur S AU - Forder J PY - 2020 JO - BMJ open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709 ER -
APA
A, T., AJ, P., C, G., M, P., R, C., S, S., & J, F. (2020). How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041709
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:56:54.422Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:56:54.441Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:56:54.412Z