Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339
- Published
- 2021-05
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339,
title = {Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal},
author = {Camila Olarte Parra and Lorenzo Bertizzolo and Sara Schroter and Agnès Dechartres and Els Goetghebeur},
year = {2021},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal AU - Camila Olarte Parra AU - Lorenzo Bertizzolo AU - Sara Schroter AU - Agnès Dechartres AU - Els Goetghebeur PY - 2021 JO - BMJ Open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339 ER -
APA
Parra, C. O., Bertizzolo, L., Schroter, S., Dechartres, A., & Goetghebeur, E. (2021). Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-06T09:14:52.400Z