Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241
- Published
- 2021 Dec 14
- Container
- BMJ open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241,
title = {Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review.},
author = {Abrahamson V and Zhang W and Wilson PM and Farr W and Reddy V and Parr J and Peckham A and Male I},
year = {2021},
journal = {BMJ open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review. AU - Abrahamson V AU - Zhang W AU - Wilson PM AU - Farr W AU - Reddy V AU - Parr J AU - Peckham A AU - Male I PY - 2021 JO - BMJ open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241 ER -
APA
V, A., W, Z., PM, W., W, F., V, R., J, P., A, P., & I, M. (2021). Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051241
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:17:11.664Z