Non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring vs conventional monitoring during labour in a tertiary obstetric care centre in the Netherlands: study protocol of a cohort intervention random sampling study (NIEM-II study).
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901
- Published
- 2025 Jul 22
- Container
- BMJ open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901,
title = {Non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring vs conventional monitoring during labour in a tertiary obstetric care centre in the Netherlands: study protocol of a cohort intervention random sampling study (NIEM-II study).},
author = {Berben PBQ and de Klerk ND and van der Ven M and Fransen AF and Niemarkt HJ and van den Heuvel ER and van der Hout-van der Jagt MB and Oei SG and van Laar JOEH},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMJ open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring vs conventional monitoring during labour in a tertiary obstetric care centre in the Netherlands: study protocol of a cohort intervention random sampling study (NIEM-II study). AU - Berben PBQ AU - de Klerk ND AU - van der Ven M AU - Fransen AF AU - Niemarkt HJ AU - van den Heuvel ER AU - van der Hout-van der Jagt MB AU - Oei SG AU - van Laar JOEH PY - 2025 JO - BMJ open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901 ER -
APA
PBQ, B., ND, D. K., M, V. D. V., AF, F., HJ, N., ER, V. D. H., MB, V. D. H. D. J., SG, O., & JOEH, V. L. (2025). Non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring vs conventional monitoring during labour in a tertiary obstetric care centre in the Netherlands: study protocol of a cohort intervention random sampling study (NIEM-II study).. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102901
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:28:16.872Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:28:16.886Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:28:16.893Z