Exploring views on remuneration for review: a survey of patient and public reviewers for <i>The BMJ</i>
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983
- Published
- 2026-08
- Container
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983,
title = {Exploring views on remuneration for review: a survey of patient and public reviewers for
<i>The BMJ</i>},
author = {Sara Schroter and Rebecca Harmston and Emma Doble and Sophie Cook and Amy Price},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMJ Open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983}
}RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploring views on remuneration for review: a survey of patient and public reviewers for
<i>The BMJ</i>
AU - Sara Schroter
AU - Rebecca Harmston
AU - Emma Doble
AU - Sophie Cook
AU - Amy Price
PY - 2026
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983
ER - APA
Schroter, S., Harmston, R., Doble, E., Cook, S., & Price, A. (2026). Exploring views on remuneration for review: a survey of patient and public reviewers for <i>The BMJ</i>. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110983
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T16:50:14.751Z