Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.

Argintar E, Homann CM, Hillson R, Steinbach I, Gee CW, Rossettie S, Burnett A, Wigham R

Open source

DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428
Published
2026 Aug 31
Container
BMJ open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428,
  title = {Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.},
  author = {Argintar E and Homann CM and Hillson R and Steinbach I and Gee CW and Rossettie S and Burnett A and Wigham R},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMJ open},
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.
AU  - Argintar E
AU  - Homann CM
AU  - Hillson R
AU  - Steinbach I
AU  - Gee CW
AU  - Rossettie S
AU  - Burnett A
AU  - Wigham R
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMJ open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428
ER  - 

APA

E, A., CM, H., R, H., I, S., CW, G., S, R., A, B., & R, W. (2026). Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428

Source records