Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428
- Published
- 2026 Aug 31
- Container
- BMJ open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428,
title = {Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.},
author = {Argintar E and Homann CM and Hillson R and Steinbach I and Gee CW and Rossettie S and Burnett A and Wigham R},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMJ open},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis. AU - Argintar E AU - Homann CM AU - Hillson R AU - Steinbach I AU - Gee CW AU - Rossettie S AU - Burnett A AU - Wigham R PY - 2026 JO - BMJ open DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428 ER -
APA
E, A., CM, H., R, H., I, S., CW, G., S, R., A, B., & R, W. (2026). Environmental impact of NanoNeedle arthroscopy versus conventional knee arthroscopy: a hybrid carbon footprint analysis.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119428
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:54:00.005Z