Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.

Murali K, Hegde N, S A, M V, Agarwal D, Manthri Rangaraj R, Hullur R, Sidiq K, S V

Open source

DOI
10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553
Published
2026 Jun 2
Container
BMJ open ophthalmology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553,
  title = {Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.},
  author = {Murali K and Hegde N and S A and M V and Agarwal D and Manthri Rangaraj R and Hullur R and Sidiq K and S V},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMJ open ophthalmology},
  doi = {10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.
AU  - Murali K
AU  - Hegde N
AU  - S A
AU  - M V
AU  - Agarwal D
AU  - Manthri Rangaraj R
AU  - Hullur R
AU  - Sidiq K
AU  - S V
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMJ open ophthalmology
DO  - 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553
ER  - 

APA

K, M., N, H., A, S., V, M., D, A., R, M. R., R, H., K, S., & V, S. (2026). Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.. BMJ open ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553

Source records