Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553
- Published
- 2026 Jun 2
- Container
- BMJ open ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553,
title = {Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.},
author = {Murali K and Hegde N and S A and M V and Agarwal D and Manthri Rangaraj R and Hullur R and Sidiq K and S V},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMJ open ophthalmology},
doi = {10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study. AU - Murali K AU - Hegde N AU - S A AU - M V AU - Agarwal D AU - Manthri Rangaraj R AU - Hullur R AU - Sidiq K AU - S V PY - 2026 JO - BMJ open ophthalmology DO - 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553 ER -
APA
K, M., N, H., A, S., V, M., D, A., R, M. R., R, H., K, S., & V, S. (2026). Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study.. BMJ open ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002553
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:55:49.499Z