Five principles to prioritise in small-scale surgical quality improvement: a qualitative study of the views of surgical improvement leaders
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917
- Published
- 2025-01
- Container
- BMJ Open Quality
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917,
title = {Five principles to prioritise in small-scale surgical quality improvement: a qualitative study of the views of surgical improvement leaders},
author = {Clifford Y Ko and Alessandra Giusti and Graham Martin and Mary Dixon-Woods},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMJ Open Quality},
doi = {10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Five principles to prioritise in small-scale surgical quality improvement: a qualitative study of the views of surgical improvement leaders AU - Clifford Y Ko AU - Alessandra Giusti AU - Graham Martin AU - Mary Dixon-Woods PY - 2025 JO - BMJ Open Quality DO - 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917 ER -
APA
Ko, C. Y., Giusti, A., Martin, G., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2025). Five principles to prioritise in small-scale surgical quality improvement: a qualitative study of the views of surgical improvement leaders. BMJ Open Quality. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002917
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:29:23.512Z