Assessing organisational commitment and readiness through the DANMM project: a mixed-methods study.
- DOI
- 10.1136/leader-2026-001545
- Published
- 2026 Sep 8
- Container
- BMJ leader
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/leader-2026-001545,
title = {Assessing organisational commitment and readiness through the DANMM project: a mixed-methods study.},
author = {Pietsch T and Biles J and Christian B and Biles B and Anderson J and Fealy S and Damm A and Dawson N and Sara G},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMJ leader},
doi = {10.1136/leader-2026-001545},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2026-001545}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing organisational commitment and readiness through the DANMM project: a mixed-methods study. AU - Pietsch T AU - Biles J AU - Christian B AU - Biles B AU - Anderson J AU - Fealy S AU - Damm A AU - Dawson N AU - Sara G PY - 2026 JO - BMJ leader DO - 10.1136/leader-2026-001545 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2026-001545 ER -
APA
T, P., J, B., B, C., B, B., J, A., S, F., A, D., N, D., & G, S. (2026). Assessing organisational commitment and readiness through the DANMM project: a mixed-methods study.. BMJ leader. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2026-001545
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:22:26.242Z