Caseload management and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis in primary/secondary versus tertiary care settings-design of the IMPULSE enhanced registry.
- DOI
- 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019
- Published
- 2019-07-21
- Container
- Open Heart
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019,
title = {Caseload management and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis in primary/secondary versus tertiary care settings-design of the IMPULSE enhanced registry.},
author = {Rudolph TK and Messika-Zeitoun D and Frey N and Lutz M and Krapf L and Passefort S and Fryearson J and Simpson H and Mortensen K and Rehse S and Tiroke A and Dodos F and Mies F and Pohlmann C and Kurucova J and Thoenes M and Bramlage P and Steeds RP.},
year = {2019},
journal = {Open Heart},
doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Caseload management and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis in primary/secondary versus tertiary care settings-design of the IMPULSE enhanced registry. AU - Rudolph TK AU - Messika-Zeitoun D AU - Frey N AU - Lutz M AU - Krapf L AU - Passefort S AU - Fryearson J AU - Simpson H AU - Mortensen K AU - Rehse S AU - Tiroke A AU - Dodos F AU - Mies F AU - Pohlmann C AU - Kurucova J AU - Thoenes M AU - Bramlage P AU - Steeds RP. PY - 2019 JO - Open Heart DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019 ER -
APA
TK, R., D, M., N, F., M, L., L, K., S, P., J, F., H, S., K, M., S, R., A, T., F, D., F, M., C, P., J, K., M, T., P, B., & RP., S. (2019). Caseload management and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis in primary/secondary versus tertiary care settings-design of the IMPULSE enhanced registry.. Open Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:50:24.052Z