Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.
- DOI
- 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772
- Published
- 2021 Sep
- Container
- Open heart
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772,
title = {Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.},
author = {Dolmaci OB and Driessen AHG and Klautz RJM and Poelmann R and Lindeman JHN and Grewal N},
year = {2021},
journal = {Open heart},
doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective. AU - Dolmaci OB AU - Driessen AHG AU - Klautz RJM AU - Poelmann R AU - Lindeman JHN AU - Grewal N PY - 2021 JO - Open heart DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772 ER -
APA
OB, D., AHG, D., RJM, K., R, P., JHN, L., & N, G. (2021). Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.. Open heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:10:53.921Z