Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.

Dolmaci OB, Driessen AHG, Klautz RJM, Poelmann R, Lindeman JHN, Grewal N

Open source

DOI
10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772
Published
2021 Sep
Container
Open heart
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772,
  title = {Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.},
  author = {Dolmaci OB and Driessen AHG and Klautz RJM and Poelmann R and Lindeman JHN and Grewal N},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Open heart},
  doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.
AU  - Dolmaci OB
AU  - Driessen AHG
AU  - Klautz RJM
AU  - Poelmann R
AU  - Lindeman JHN
AU  - Grewal N
PY  - 2021
JO  - Open heart
DO  - 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772
ER  - 

APA

OB, D., AHG, D., RJM, K., R, P., JHN, L., & N, G. (2021). Comparative evaluation of coronary disease burden: bicuspid valve disease is not atheroprotective.. Open heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001772

Source records