Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.

Umeh UO, Li Z, Lu C, Jaremko K, Li J, Pulos BP.

Open source

DOI
10.1136/rapm-2026-108245
Published
2026-08-28
Container
Reg Anesth Pain Med
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/rapm-2026-108245,
  title = {Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.},
  author = {Umeh UO and  Li Z and  Lu C and  Jaremko K and  Li J and  Pulos BP.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Reg Anesth Pain Med},
  doi = {10.1136/rapm-2026-108245},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.
AU  - Umeh UO
AU  -  Li Z
AU  -  Lu C
AU  -  Jaremko K
AU  -  Li J
AU  -  Pulos BP.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Reg Anesth Pain Med
DO  - 10.1136/rapm-2026-108245
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245
ER  - 

APA

UO, U., Z, L., C, L., K, J., J, L., & BP., P. (2026). Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.. Reg Anesth Pain Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245

Source records