Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.
- DOI
- 10.1136/rapm-2026-108245
- Published
- 2026-08-28
- Container
- Reg Anesth Pain Med
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/rapm-2026-108245,
title = {Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.},
author = {Umeh UO and Li Z and Lu C and Jaremko K and Li J and Pulos BP.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Reg Anesth Pain Med},
doi = {10.1136/rapm-2026-108245},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks. AU - Umeh UO AU - Li Z AU - Lu C AU - Jaremko K AU - Li J AU - Pulos BP. PY - 2026 JO - Reg Anesth Pain Med DO - 10.1136/rapm-2026-108245 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245 ER -
APA
UO, U., Z, L., C, L., K, J., J, L., & BP., P. (2026). Wrong-site procedure reporting in the USA: a 51-jurisdiction analysis centered on wrong-site blocks.. Reg Anesth Pain Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108245
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:18:24.626Z