Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?

Cassell JA, Brook MG, Mercer CH, Murphy S, Johnson AM

DOI: 10.1136/sti.79.1.11
Published: 2003 Feb
Container: Sexually transmitted infections
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1136/sti.79.1.11,
  title = {Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?},
  author = {Cassell JA and Brook MG and Mercer CH and Murphy S and Johnson AM},
  year = {2003},
  journal = {Sexually transmitted infections},
  doi = {10.1136/sti.79.1.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.1.11}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?
AU  - Cassell JA
AU  - Brook MG
AU  - Mercer CH
AU  - Murphy S
AU  - Johnson AM
PY  - 2003
JO  - Sexually transmitted infections
DO  - 10.1136/sti.79.1.11
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.1.11
ER  -

APA

JA, C., MG, B., CH, M., S, M., & AM, J. (2003). Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?. Sexually transmitted infections. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.1.11

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:14:38.099Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:14:38.116Z