Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus.
- DOI
- 10.1136/vr.105964
- Published
- 2020-07-05
- Container
- Vet Rec
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1136/vr.105964,
title = {Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus.},
author = {Rioja-Lang F and Bacon H and Connor M and Dwyer CM.},
year = {2020},
journal = {Vet Rec},
doi = {10.1136/vr.105964},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105964}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus. AU - Rioja-Lang F AU - Bacon H AU - Connor M AU - Dwyer CM. PY - 2020 JO - Vet Rec DO - 10.1136/vr.105964 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105964 ER -
APA
F, R., H, B., M, C., & CM., D. (2020). Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus.. Vet Rec. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105964
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:28:00.313Z