Considerations for effective science communication
- DOI
- 10.1139/facets-2016-0055
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Container
- FACETS
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1139/facets-2016-0055,
title = {Considerations for effective science communication},
author = {Steven J. Cooke and Austin J. Gallagher and Natalie M. Sopinka and Vivian M. Nguyen and Rachel A. Skubel and Neil Hammerschlag and Sarah Boon and Nathan Young and Andy J. Danylchuk},
year = {2017},
journal = {FACETS},
doi = {10.1139/facets-2016-0055},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Considerations for effective science communication AU - Steven J. Cooke AU - Austin J. Gallagher AU - Natalie M. Sopinka AU - Vivian M. Nguyen AU - Rachel A. Skubel AU - Neil Hammerschlag AU - Sarah Boon AU - Nathan Young AU - Andy J. Danylchuk PY - 2017 JO - FACETS DO - 10.1139/facets-2016-0055 UR - https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055 ER -
APA
Cooke, S. J., Gallagher, A. J., Sopinka, N. M., Nguyen, V. M., Skubel, R. A., Hammerschlag, N., Boon, S., Young, N., & Danylchuk, A. J. (2017). Considerations for effective science communication. FACETS. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:24:56.757Z