Intracoronary Adenosine versus Intravenous Adenosine during Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Which One Offers Better Outcomes in terms of Microvascular Obstruction?

Gemina Doolub, Erica Dall'Armellina

Open source

DOI
10.1155/2013/248476
Published
2013-03-27
Container
ISRN Cardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 29/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1155/2013/248476,
  title = {Intracoronary Adenosine versus Intravenous Adenosine during Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Which One Offers Better Outcomes in terms of Microvascular Obstruction?},
  author = {Gemina Doolub and Erica Dall'Armellina},
  year = {2013},
  journal = {ISRN Cardiology},
  doi = {10.1155/2013/248476},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248476}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intracoronary Adenosine versus Intravenous Adenosine during Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Which One Offers Better Outcomes in terms of Microvascular Obstruction?
AU  - Gemina Doolub
AU  - Erica Dall'Armellina
PY  - 2013
JO  - ISRN Cardiology
DO  - 10.1155/2013/248476
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248476
ER  - 

APA

Doolub, G., & Dall'Armellina, E. (2013). Intracoronary Adenosine versus Intravenous Adenosine during Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Which One Offers Better Outcomes in terms of Microvascular Obstruction?. ISRN Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248476

Source records