Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
- DOI
- 10.1155/2014/205230
- Published
- 2014
- Container
- Obstetrics and Gynecology International
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1155/2014/205230,
title = {Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence},
author = {O. Meirik and E. Banks and T. Farley and O. Akande and H. Bathija and M. Ali},
year = {2014},
journal = {Obstetrics and Gynecology International},
doi = {10.1155/2014/205230},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/205230}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence AU - O. Meirik AU - E. Banks AU - T. Farley AU - O. Akande AU - H. Bathija AU - M. Ali PY - 2014 JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology International DO - 10.1155/2014/205230 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/205230 ER -
APA
Meirik, O., Banks, E., Farley, T., Akande, O., Bathija, H., & Ali, M. (2014). Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/205230
Source records
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:44:02.032Z