Comparative Evaluation of Bone Repair with Four Different Bone Substitutes in Critical Size Defects.
- DOI
- 10.1155/2020/5182845
- Published
- 2020
- Container
- International journal of biomaterials
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1155/2020/5182845,
title = {Comparative Evaluation of Bone Repair with Four Different Bone Substitutes in Critical Size Defects.},
author = {Grossi-Oliveira G and Faverani LP and Mendes BC and Braga Polo TO and Batista Mendes GC and de Lima VN and Ribeiro Júnior PD and Okamoto R and Magro-Filho O},
year = {2020},
journal = {International journal of biomaterials},
doi = {10.1155/2020/5182845},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5182845}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative Evaluation of Bone Repair with Four Different Bone Substitutes in Critical Size Defects. AU - Grossi-Oliveira G AU - Faverani LP AU - Mendes BC AU - Braga Polo TO AU - Batista Mendes GC AU - de Lima VN AU - Ribeiro Júnior PD AU - Okamoto R AU - Magro-Filho O PY - 2020 JO - International journal of biomaterials DO - 10.1155/2020/5182845 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5182845 ER -
APA
G, G., LP, F., BC, M., TO, B. P., GC, B. M., VN, D. L., PD, R. J., R, O., & O, M. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Bone Repair with Four Different Bone Substitutes in Critical Size Defects.. International journal of biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5182845
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T09:12:08.337Z