Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Li R, Li J, Chen S, Xiao B, Liu L, Zhu N

Open source

DOI
10.1155/2021/7739628
Published
2021
Container
BioMed research international
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1155/2021/7739628,
  title = {Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.},
  author = {Li R and Li J and Chen S and Xiao B and Liu L and Zhu N},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {BioMed research international},
  doi = {10.1155/2021/7739628},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
AU  - Li R
AU  - Li J
AU  - Chen S
AU  - Xiao B
AU  - Liu L
AU  - Zhu N
PY  - 2021
JO  - BioMed research international
DO  - 10.1155/2021/7739628
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628
ER  - 

APA

R, L., J, L., S, C., B, X., L, L., & N, Z. (2021). Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.. BioMed research international. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628

Source records