Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
- DOI
- 10.1155/2021/7739628
- Published
- 2021
- Container
- BioMed research international
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1155/2021/7739628,
title = {Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.},
author = {Li R and Li J and Chen S and Xiao B and Liu L and Zhu N},
year = {2021},
journal = {BioMed research international},
doi = {10.1155/2021/7739628},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study. AU - Li R AU - Li J AU - Chen S AU - Xiao B AU - Liu L AU - Zhu N PY - 2021 JO - BioMed research international DO - 10.1155/2021/7739628 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628 ER -
APA
R, L., J, L., S, C., B, X., L, L., & N, Z. (2021). Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study.. BioMed research international. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7739628
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T19:53:14.128Z