The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes.

Luraschi R, Barrera-Avalos C, Vallejos-Vidal E, Alarcón J, Mella-Torres A, Hernández F, Inostroza-Molina A, Valdés D, Imarai M, Acuña-Castillo C, Reyes-López FE, Sandino AM

Open source

DOI: 10.1155/2022/2594564
Published: 2022
Container: The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 27/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
serious concernRetraction Watch expression of concern: 1 expression of concern notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1155/2022/2594564,
  title = {The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes.},
  author = {Luraschi R and Barrera-Avalos C and Vallejos-Vidal E and Alarcón J and Mella-Torres A and Hernández F and Inostroza-Molina A and Valdés D and Imarai M and Acuña-Castillo C and Reyes-López FE and Sandino AM},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {The Canadian journal of infectious diseases \& medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale},
  doi = {10.1155/2022/2594564},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes.
AU  - Luraschi R
AU  - Barrera-Avalos C
AU  - Vallejos-Vidal E
AU  - Alarcón J
AU  - Mella-Torres A
AU  - Hernández F
AU  - Inostroza-Molina A
AU  - Valdés D
AU  - Imarai M
AU  - Acuña-Castillo C
AU  - Reyes-López FE
AU  - Sandino AM
PY  - 2022
JO  - The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale
DO  - 10.1155/2022/2594564
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564
ER  -

APA

R, L., C, B., E, V., J, A., A, M., F, H., A, I., D, V., M, I., C, A., FE, R., & AM, S. (2022). The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes.. The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:09:08.276Z