The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes

Roberto Luraschi, Carlos Barrera-Avalos, Eva Vallejos-Vidal, Javiera Alarcón, Andrea Mella-Torres, Felipe Hernández, Ailen Inostroza-Molina, Daniel Valdés, Mónica Imarai, Claudio Acuña-Castillo, Felipe E. Reyes-López, Ana María Sandino

Open source

DOI: 10.1155/2022/2594564
Published: 2022-07-05
Container: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Publisher: Wiley
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 46/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
serious concernRetraction Watch expression of concern: 1 expression of concern notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1155/2022/2594564,
  title = {The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes},
  author = {Roberto Luraschi and Carlos Barrera-Avalos and Eva Vallejos-Vidal and Javiera Alarcón and Andrea Mella-Torres and Felipe Hernández and Ailen Inostroza-Molina and Daniel Valdés and Mónica Imarai and Claudio Acuña-Castillo and Felipe E. Reyes-López and Ana María Sandino},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology},
  doi = {10.1155/2022/2594564},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes
AU  - Roberto Luraschi
AU  - Carlos Barrera-Avalos
AU  - Eva Vallejos-Vidal
AU  - Javiera Alarcón
AU  - Andrea Mella-Torres
AU  - Felipe Hernández
AU  - Ailen Inostroza-Molina
AU  - Daniel Valdés
AU  - Mónica Imarai
AU  - Claudio Acuña-Castillo
AU  - Felipe E. Reyes-López
AU  - Ana María Sandino
PY  - 2022
JO  - Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
DO  - 10.1155/2022/2594564
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564
ER  -

APA

Luraschi, R., Barrera-Avalos, C., Vallejos-Vidal, E., Alarcón, J., Mella-Torres, A., Hernández, F., Inostroza-Molina, A., Valdés, D., Imarai, M., Acuña-Castillo, C., Reyes-López, F. E., & Sandino, A. M. (2022). The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-09T00:48:17.361Z