Retracted: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Engineering JOH.

Open source

DOI
10.1155/2023/9879237
Published
2023-02-02
Container
J Healthc Eng
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1155/2023/9879237,
  title = {Retracted: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
  author = {Engineering JOH.},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {J Healthc Eng},
  doi = {10.1155/2023/9879237},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9879237}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Retracted: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Engineering JOH.
PY  - 2023
JO  - J Healthc Eng
DO  - 10.1155/2023/9879237
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9879237
ER  - 

APA

JOH., E. (2023). Retracted: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. J Healthc Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9879237

Source records