Zur Bewertung des Gutachterverfahrens für die ambulante Verhaltenstherapie durch die GutachterInnen. Replik auf den Text von Altherr et al.: Stellungnahme der Gutachter für Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltenstherapie 2002;12:75–76.
- DOI
- 10.1159/000066574
- Published
- 2002
- Container
- Verhaltenstherapie
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1159/000066574,
title = {Zur Bewertung des Gutachterverfahrens für die ambulante Verhaltenstherapie durch die GutachterInnen. Replik auf den Text von Altherr et al.: Stellungnahme der Gutachter für Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltenstherapie 2002;12:75–76.},
author = {H. Vogel and W. Lemisz and H. Liebeck and W. Palm},
year = {2002},
journal = {Verhaltenstherapie},
doi = {10.1159/000066574},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000066574}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Zur Bewertung des Gutachterverfahrens für die ambulante Verhaltenstherapie durch die GutachterInnen. Replik auf den Text von Altherr et al.: Stellungnahme der Gutachter für Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltenstherapie 2002;12:75–76. AU - H. Vogel AU - W. Lemisz AU - H. Liebeck AU - W. Palm PY - 2002 JO - Verhaltenstherapie DO - 10.1159/000066574 UR - https://doi.org/10.1159/000066574 ER -
APA
Vogel, H., Lemisz, W., Liebeck, H., & Palm, W. (2002). Zur Bewertung des Gutachterverfahrens für die ambulante Verhaltenstherapie durch die GutachterInnen. Replik auf den Text von Altherr et al.: Stellungnahme der Gutachter für Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltenstherapie 2002;12:75–76.. Verhaltenstherapie. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066574
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T06:16:35.116Z