Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.

Katz R, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Van Velthoven R, Delmas V, Abbou CC

DOI: 10.1159/000072684
Published: 2003
Container: Urologia internationalis
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1159/000072684,
  title = {Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.},
  author = {Katz R and Hoznek A and Antiphon P and Van Velthoven R and Delmas V and Abbou CC},
  year = {2003},
  journal = {Urologia internationalis},
  doi = {10.1159/000072684},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000072684}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.
AU  - Katz R
AU  - Hoznek A
AU  - Antiphon P
AU  - Van Velthoven R
AU  - Delmas V
AU  - Abbou CC
PY  - 2003
JO  - Urologia internationalis
DO  - 10.1159/000072684
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1159/000072684
ER  -

APA

R, K., A, H., P, A., R, V. V., V, D., & CC, A. (2003). Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.. Urologia internationalis. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072684

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:22:48.593Z