Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study
- DOI
- 10.1159/000509303
- Published
- 2020
- Container
- Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1159/000509303,
title = {Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study},
author = {Gaëtan Poulen and Emilie Chan Seng and Nicolas Menjot De Champfleur and Laura Cif and Fabienne Cyprien and Jerome Perez and Philippe Coubes},
year = {2020},
journal = {Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery},
doi = {10.1159/000509303},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000509303}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study AU - Gaëtan Poulen AU - Emilie Chan Seng AU - Nicolas Menjot De Champfleur AU - Laura Cif AU - Fabienne Cyprien AU - Jerome Perez AU - Philippe Coubes PY - 2020 JO - Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery DO - 10.1159/000509303 UR - https://doi.org/10.1159/000509303 ER -
APA
Poulen, G., Seng, E. C., Champfleur, N. M. D., Cif, L., Cyprien, F., Perez, J., & Coubes, P. (2020). Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509303
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-08T04:35:39.254Z