The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes: The Worst System, Except for All the Others.

Burke JF, Nallamothu BK, Ho PM

Open source

DOI
10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853
Published
2017 May
Container
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853,
  title = {The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes: The Worst System, Except for All the Others.},
  author = {Burke JF and Nallamothu BK and Ho PM},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes},
  doi = {10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes: The Worst System, Except for All the Others.
AU  - Burke JF
AU  - Nallamothu BK
AU  - Ho PM
PY  - 2017
JO  - Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
DO  - 10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853
ER  - 

APA

JF, B., BK, N., & PM, H. (2017). The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes: The Worst System, Except for All the Others.. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003853

Source records